Elena Vargas, BSC News Investigative Reporter – September 12, 2025 – Washington, D.C.
In a bombshell disclosure shaking the nation, leaked records from high-level MAGA insiders have exposed a White House cover-up: President Donald J. Trump’s six-day absence last month was for recovery from a severe ischemic stroke, not the “chronic venom treatment” claimed publicly.
Obtained by BSC News just 30 minutes ago from disillusioned MAGA sources, the documents detail an irrefutable timeline. On August 15, 2025, Trump suffered the stroke at the White House, caused by a blood clot that impaired his motor functions and speech. Medical logs from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center reveal he was rushed there under the guise of a routine check-up. The six-day period—from August 16 to 21—was carefully calibrated for thrombolytic therapy, physical rehabilitation, and neurological assessments to hide any visible deficits upon his return.
The ruse has ignited widespread fury. Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s “venom treatment” story, tied to fabricated “residual effects” from a 2024 assassination attempt with a poisoned projectile, was deliberate misinformation, per internal memos. Trump’s team picked this obscure tale to fuel conspiracy theories and dodge scrutiny over his fitness amid escalating global challenges.
More alarmingly, the files suggest cognitive complications: post-stroke memory lapses and decision-making delays, downplayed in evaluations. A senior advisor’s memo cautions, “Recovery is complete, but monitor lingering effects on national security decisions.” This secrecy prompts urgent questions about transparency when the nation’s fate is at stake.
Betrayed leakers, loyal MAGA supporters, stated anonymously: “We fought for Trump’s truth; this erodes our cause.” Analysts foresee a Republican rift, with impeachment calls and 25th Amendment talk surging. The White House remains silent, but evidence—scans, timelines, and witness accounts—is overwhelming. As 2026 midterms loom, this betrayal tests Trump’s presidency: accountability or collapse?
